Futures
Introduction
In the Scala Standard Library, a Future is a data structure used to retrieve the result of some concurrent operation. This result can be accessed synchronously (blocking) or asynchronously (non-blocking).
Execution Contexts
In order to execute callbacks and operations, Futures need something called an ExecutionContext
,
which is very similar to a java.util.concurrent.Executor
. if you have an ActorSystem
in scope,
it will use its default dispatcher as the ExecutionContext
, or you can use the factory methods provided
by the ExecutionContext
companion object to wrap Executors
and ExecutorServices
, or even create your own.
import scala.concurrent.{ ExecutionContext, Promise }
implicit val ec = ExecutionContext.fromExecutorService(yourExecutorServiceGoesHere)
// Do stuff with your brand new shiny ExecutionContext
val f = Promise.successful("foo")
// Then shut your ExecutionContext down at some
// appropriate place in your program/application
ec.shutdown()
Within Actors
Each actor is configured to be run on a MessageDispatcher
, and that
dispatcher doubles as an ExecutionContext
. If the nature of the Future
calls invoked by the actor matches or is compatible with the activities of that
actor (e.g. all CPU bound and no latency requirements), then it may be easiest
to reuse the dispatcher for running the Futures by importing
context.dispatcher
.
class A extends Actor {
import context.dispatcher
val f = Future("hello")
def receive = {
// receive omitted ...
}
}
Use With Actors
There are generally two ways of getting a reply from an Actor
: the first is by a sent message (actor ! msg
),
which only works if the original sender was an Actor
) and the second is through a Future
.
Using an Actor
's ?
method to send a message will return a Future
:
import scala.concurrent.Await
import akka.pattern.ask
import akka.util.Timeout
import scala.concurrent.duration._
implicit val timeout = Timeout(5 seconds)
val future = actor ? msg // enabled by the “ask” import
val result = Await.result(future, timeout.duration).asInstanceOf[String]
This will cause the current thread to block and wait for the Actor
to 'complete' the Future
with it's reply.
Blocking is discouraged though as it will cause performance problems.
The blocking operations are located in Await.result
and Await.ready
to make it easy to spot where blocking occurs.
Alternatives to blocking are discussed further within this documentation. Also note that the Future
returned by
an Actor
is a Future[Any]
since an Actor
is dynamic. That is why the asInstanceOf
is used in the above sample.
When using non-blocking it is better to use the mapTo
method to safely try to cast a Future
to an expected type:
import scala.concurrent.Future
import akka.pattern.ask
val future: Future[String] = ask(actor, msg).mapTo[String]
The mapTo
method will return a new Future
that contains the result if the cast was successful,
or a ClassCastException
if not. Handling Exception
s will be discussed further within this documentation.
To send the result of a Future
to an Actor
, you can use the pipe
construct:
import akka.pattern.pipe
future pipeTo actor
Use Directly
A common use case within Akka is to have some computation performed concurrently without needing the extra utility of an Actor
.
If you find yourself creating a pool of Actor
s for the sole reason of performing a calculation in parallel,
there is an easier (and faster) way:
import scala.concurrent.Await
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.duration._
val future = Future {
"Hello" + "World"
}
future foreach println
In the above code the block passed to Future
will be executed by the default Dispatcher
,
with the return value of the block used to complete the Future
(in this case, the result would be the string: "HelloWorld").
Unlike a Future
that is returned from an Actor
, this Future
is properly typed,
and we also avoid the overhead of managing an Actor
.
You can also create already completed Futures using the Future
companion, which can be either successes:
val future = Future.successful("Yay!")
Or failures:
val otherFuture = Future.failed[String](new IllegalArgumentException("Bang!"))
It is also possible to create an empty Promise
, to be filled later, and obtain the corresponding Future
:
val promise = Promise[String]()
val theFuture = promise.future
promise.success("hello")
Functional Futures
Scala's Future
has several monadic methods that are very similar to the ones used by Scala's collections.
These allow you to create 'pipelines' or 'streams' that the result will travel through.
Future is a Monad
The first method for working with Future
functionally is map
. This method takes a Function
which performs some operation on the result of the Future
, and returning a new result.
The return value of the map
method is another Future
that will contain the new result:
val f1 = Future {
"Hello" + "World"
}
val f2 = f1 map { x =>
x.length
}
f2 foreach println
In this example we are joining two strings together within a Future
. Instead of waiting for this to complete,
we apply our function that calculates the length of the string using the map
method.
Now we have a second Future
that will eventually contain an Int
.
When our original Future
completes, it will also apply our function and complete the second Future
with its result.
When we finally get the result, it will contain the number 10. Our original Future
still contains the
string "HelloWorld" and is unaffected by the map
.
The map
method is fine if we are modifying a single Future
,
but if 2 or more Future
s are involved map
will not allow you to combine them together:
val f1 = Future {
"Hello" + "World"
}
val f2 = Future.successful(3)
val f3 = f1 map { x =>
f2 map { y =>
x.length * y
}
}
f3 foreach println
f3
is a Future[Future[Int]]
instead of the desired Future[Int]
. Instead, the flatMap
method should be used:
val f1 = Future {
"Hello" + "World"
}
val f2 = Future.successful(3)
val f3 = f1 flatMap { x =>
f2 map { y =>
x.length * y
}
}
f3 foreach println
Composing futures using nested combinators it can sometimes become quite complicated and hard read, in these cases using Scala's 'for comprehensions' usually yields more readable code. See next section for examples.
If you need to do conditional propagation, you can use filter
:
val future1 = Future.successful(4)
val future2 = future1.filter(_ % 2 == 0)
future2 foreach println
val failedFilter = future1.filter(_ % 2 == 1).recover {
// When filter fails, it will have a java.util.NoSuchElementException
case m: NoSuchElementException => 0
}
failedFilter foreach println
For Comprehensions
Since Future
has a map
, filter
and flatMap
method it can be easily used in a 'for comprehension':
val f = for {
a <- Future(10 / 2) // 10 / 2 = 5
b <- Future(a + 1) // 5 + 1 = 6
c <- Future(a - 1) // 5 - 1 = 4
if c > 3 // Future.filter
} yield b * c // 6 * 4 = 24
// Note that the execution of futures a, b, and c
// are not done in parallel.
f foreach println
Something to keep in mind when doing this is even though it looks like parts of the above example can run in parallel,
each step of the for comprehension is run sequentially. This will happen on separate threads for each step but
there isn't much benefit over running the calculations all within a single Future
.
The real benefit comes when the Future
s are created first, and then combining them together.
Composing Futures
The example for comprehension above is an example of composing Future
s.
A common use case for this is combining the replies of several Actor
s into a single calculation
without resorting to calling Await.result
or Await.ready
to block for each result.
First an example of using Await.result
:
val f1 = ask(actor1, msg1)
val f2 = ask(actor2, msg2)
val a = Await.result(f1, 3 seconds).asInstanceOf[Int]
val b = Await.result(f2, 3 seconds).asInstanceOf[Int]
val f3 = ask(actor3, (a + b))
val result = Await.result(f3, 3 seconds).asInstanceOf[Int]
Warning
Await.result
and Await.ready
are provided for exceptional situations where you must block,
a good rule of thumb is to only use them if you know why you must block. For all other cases, use
asynchronous composition as described below.
Here we wait for the results from the first 2 Actor
s before sending that result to the third Actor
.
We called Await.result
3 times, which caused our little program to block 3 times before getting our final result.
Now compare that to this example:
val f1 = ask(actor1, msg1)
val f2 = ask(actor2, msg2)
val f3 = for {
a <- f1.mapTo[Int]
b <- f2.mapTo[Int]
c <- ask(actor3, (a + b)).mapTo[Int]
} yield c
f3 foreach println
Here we have 2 actors processing a single message each. Once the 2 results are available
(note that we don't block to get these results!), they are being added together and sent to a third Actor
,
which replies with a string, which we assign to 'result'.
This is fine when dealing with a known amount of Actors, but can grow unwieldy if we have more than a handful.
The sequence
and traverse
helper methods can make it easier to handle more complex use cases.
Both of these methods are ways of turning, for a subclass T
of Traversable
, T[Future[A]]
into a Future[T[A]]
.
For example:
// oddActor returns odd numbers sequentially from 1 as a List[Future[Int]]
val listOfFutures = List.fill(100)(akka.pattern.ask(oddActor, GetNext).mapTo[Int])
// now we have a Future[List[Int]]
val futureList = Future.sequence(listOfFutures)
// Find the sum of the odd numbers
val oddSum = futureList.map(_.sum)
oddSum foreach println
To better explain what happened in the example, Future.sequence
is taking the List[Future[Int]]
and turning it into a Future[List[Int]]
. We can then use map
to work with the List[Int]
directly,
and we find the sum of the List
.
The traverse
method is similar to sequence
, but it takes a T[A]
and a function A => Future[B]
to return a Future[T[B]]
,
where T
is again a subclass of Traversable. For example, to use traverse
to sum the first 100 odd numbers:
val futureList = Future.traverse((1 to 100).toList)(x => Future(x * 2 - 1))
val oddSum = futureList.map(_.sum)
oddSum foreach println
This is the same result as this example:
val futureList = Future.sequence((1 to 100).toList.map(x => Future(x * 2 - 1)))
val oddSum = futureList.map(_.sum)
oddSum foreach println
But it may be faster to use traverse
as it doesn't have to create an intermediate List[Future[Int]]
.
Then there's a method that's called fold
that takes a start-value, a sequence of Future
s and a function
from the type of the start-value and the type of the futures and returns something with the same type as the start-value,
and then applies the function to all elements in the sequence of futures, asynchronously,
the execution will start when the last of the Futures is completed.
// Create a sequence of Futures
val futures = for (i <- 1 to 1000) yield Future(i * 2)
val futureSum = Future.fold(futures)(0)(_ + _)
futureSum foreach println
That's all it takes!
If the sequence passed to fold
is empty, it will return the start-value, in the case above, that will be 0.
In some cases you don't have a start-value and you're able to use the value of the first completing Future
in the sequence
as the start-value, you can use reduce
, it works like this:
// Create a sequence of Futures
val futures = for (i <- 1 to 1000) yield Future(i * 2)
val futureSum = Future.reduce(futures)(_ + _)
futureSum foreach println
Same as with fold
, the execution will be done asynchronously when the last of the Future
is completed,
you can also parallelize it by chunking your futures into sub-sequences and reduce them, and then reduce the reduced results again.
Callbacks
Sometimes you just want to listen to a Future
being completed, and react to that not by creating a new Future
, but by side-effecting.
For this Scala supports onComplete
, onSuccess
and onFailure
, of which the latter two are specializations of the first.
future onSuccess {
case "bar" => println("Got my bar alright!")
case x: String => println("Got some random string: " + x)
}
future onFailure {
case ise: IllegalStateException if ise.getMessage == "OHNOES" =>
//OHNOES! We are in deep trouble, do something!
case e: Exception =>
//Do something else
}
future onComplete {
case Success(result) => doSomethingOnSuccess(result)
case Failure(failure) => doSomethingOnFailure(failure)
}
Define Ordering
Since callbacks are executed in any order and potentially in parallel,
it can be tricky at the times when you need sequential ordering of operations.
But there's a solution and it's name is andThen
. It creates a new Future
with
the specified callback, a Future
that will have the same result as the Future
it's called on,
which allows for ordering like in the following sample:
val result = Future { loadPage(url) } andThen {
case Failure(exception) => log(exception)
} andThen {
case _ => watchSomeTV()
}
result foreach println
Auxiliary Methods
Future
fallbackTo
combines 2 Futures into a new Future
, and will hold the successful value of the second Future
if the first Future
fails.
val future4 = future1 fallbackTo future2 fallbackTo future3
future4 foreach println
You can also combine two Futures into a new Future
that will hold a tuple of the two Futures successful results,
using the zip
operation.
val future3 = future1 zip future2 map { case (a, b) => a + " " + b }
future3 foreach println
Exceptions
Since the result of a Future
is created concurrently to the rest of the program, exceptions must be handled differently.
It doesn't matter if an Actor
or the dispatcher is completing the Future
,
if an Exception
is caught the Future
will contain it instead of a valid result.
If a Future
does contain an Exception
, calling Await.result
will cause it to be thrown again so it can be handled properly.
It is also possible to handle an Exception
by returning a different result.
This is done with the recover
method. For example:
val future = akka.pattern.ask(actor, msg1) recover {
case e: ArithmeticException => 0
}
future foreach println
In this example, if the actor replied with a akka.actor.Status.Failure
containing the ArithmeticException
,
our Future
would have a result of 0. The recover
method works very similarly to the standard try/catch blocks,
so multiple Exception
s can be handled in this manner, and if an Exception
is not handled this way
it will behave as if we hadn't used the recover
method.
You can also use the recoverWith
method, which has the same relationship to recover
as flatMap
has to map
,
and is use like this:
val future = akka.pattern.ask(actor, msg1) recoverWith {
case e: ArithmeticException => Future.successful(0)
case foo: IllegalArgumentException =>
Future.failed[Int](new IllegalStateException("All br0ken!"))
}
future foreach println
After
akka.pattern.after
makes it easy to complete a Future
with a value or exception after a timeout.
// TODO after is unfortunately shadowed by ScalaTest, fix as part of #3759
// import akka.pattern.after
val delayed = akka.pattern.after(200 millis, using = system.scheduler)(Future.failed(
new IllegalStateException("OHNOES")))
val future = Future { Thread.sleep(1000); "foo" }
val result = Future firstCompletedOf Seq(future, delayed)
Contents