Thread-based¶

The ‘ThreadBasedDispatcher’ binds a dedicated OS thread to each specific Actor. The messages are posted to a ‘LinkedBlockingQueue’ which feeds the messages to the dispatcher one by one. A ‘ThreadBasedDispatcher’ cannot be shared between actors. This dispatcher has worse performance and scalability than the event-based dispatcher but works great for creating “daemon” Actors that consumes a low frequency of messages and are allowed to go off and do their own thing for a longer period of time. Another advantage with this dispatcher is that Actors do not block threads for each other.

Dispatcher dispatcher = Dispatchers.newThreadBasedDispatcher(actorRef);

It would normally by used from within the actor like this:

class MyActor extends UntypedActor {
  public MyActor() {
    getContext().setDispatcher(Dispatchers.newThreadBasedDispatcher(getContext()));
  }
  ...
}

Event-based¶

The ‘ExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher’ binds a set of Actors to a thread pool backed up by a ‘BlockingQueue’. This dispatcher is highly configurable and supports a fluent configuration API to configure the ‘BlockingQueue’ (type of queue, max items etc.) as well as the thread pool.

The event-driven dispatchers must be shared between multiple Typed Actors and/or Actors. One best practice is to let each top-level Actor, e.g. the Actors you define in the declarative supervisor config, to get their own dispatcher but reuse the dispatcher for each new Actor that the top-level Actor creates. But you can also share dispatcher between multiple top-level Actors. This is very use-case specific and needs to be tried out on a case by case basis. The important thing is that Akka tries to provide you with the freedom you need to design and implement your system in the most efficient way in regards to performance, throughput and latency.

It comes with many different predefined BlockingQueue configurations:

• Bounded LinkedBlockingQueue
• Unbounded LinkedBlockingQueue
• Bounded ArrayBlockingQueue
• Unbounded ArrayBlockingQueue
• SynchronousQueue

You can also set the rejection policy that should be used, e.g. what should be done if the dispatcher (e.g. the Actor) can’t keep up and the mailbox is growing up to the limit defined. You can choose between four different rejection policies:

• java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRuns - will run the message processing in the caller’s thread as a way to slow him down and balance producer/consumer
• java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.AbortPolicy - rejected messages by throwing a ‘RejectedExecutionException’
• java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.DiscardPolicy - discards the message (throws it away)
• java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.DiscardOldestPolicy - discards the oldest message in the mailbox (throws it away)

You cane read more about these policies here.

Here is an example:

import akka.actor.Actor;
import akka.dispatch.Dispatchers;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy;

class MyActor extends UntypedActor {
   public MyActor() {
     getContext().setDispatcher(Dispatchers.newExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher(name)
      .withNewThreadPoolWithLinkedBlockingQueueWithCapacity(100)
      .setCorePoolSize(16)
      .setMaxPoolSize(128)
      .setKeepAliveTimeInMillis(60000)
      .setRejectionPolicy(new CallerRunsPolicy())
      .build());
  }
   ...
}

This ‘ExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher’ allows you to define the ‘throughput’ it should have. This defines the number of messages for a specific Actor the dispatcher should process in one single sweep. Setting this to a higher number will increase throughput but lower fairness, and vice versa. If you don’t specify it explicitly then it uses the default value defined in the ‘akka.conf’ configuration file:

actor {
  throughput = 5
}

If you don’t define a the ‘throughput’ option in the configuration file then the default value of ‘5’ will be used.

Browse the Scaladoc API or look at the code for all the options available.

Priority event-based¶

Sometimes it’s useful to be able to specify priority order of messages, that is done by using PriorityExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher and supply a java.util.Comparator[MessageInvocation] or use a akka.dispatch.PriorityGenerator (recommended):

Creating a PriorityExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher using PriorityGenerator:

package some.pkg;

import akka.actor.*;
import akka.dispatch.*;

public class Main {
    // A simple Actor that just prints the messages it processes
    public static class MyActor extends UntypedActor {
    public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
      System.out.println(message);
    }
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
      // Create a new PriorityGenerator, lower prio means more important
      PriorityGenerator gen = new PriorityGenerator() {
        public int gen(Object message) {
          if (message.equals("highpriority")) return 0;       // "highpriority" messages should be treated first if possible
          else if (message.equals("lowpriority")) return 100; // "lowpriority" messages should be treated last if possible
          else return 50; // We default to 50
        }
      };
      // We create an instance of the actor that will print out the messages it processes
    ActorRef ref = Actors.actorOf(MyActor.class);
    // We create a new Priority dispatcher and seed it with the priority generator
    ref.setDispatcher(new PriorityExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher("foo", gen));

        ref.start(); // Start the actor
    ref.getDispatcher().suspend(ref); // Suspending the actor so it doesn't start to treat the messages before we have enqueued all of them :-)
        ref.tell("lowpriority");
        ref.tell("lowpriority");
        ref.tell("highpriority");
        ref.tell("pigdog");
        ref.tell("pigdog2");
        ref.tell("pigdog3");
        ref.tell("highpriority");
    ref.getDispatcher().resume(ref); // Resuming the actor so it will start treating its messages
  }
}

Prints:

highpriority highpriority pigdog pigdog2 pigdog3 lowpriority lowpriority

Work-stealing event-based¶

The ‘ExecutorBasedEventDrivenWorkStealingDispatcher’ is a variation of the ‘ExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher’ in which Actors of the same type can be set up to share this dispatcher and during execution time the different actors will steal messages from other actors if they have less messages to process. This can be a great way to improve throughput at the cost of a little higher latency.

Normally the way you use it is to define a static field to hold the dispatcher and then set in in the Actor explicitly.

class MyActor extends UntypedActor {
  public static MessageDispatcher dispatcher = Dispatchers.newExecutorBasedEventDrivenWorkStealingDispatcher(name).build();

  public MyActor() {
    getContext().setDispatcher(dispatcher);
  }
  ...
}

Here is an article with some more information: Load Balancing Actors with Work Stealing Techniques Here is another article discussing this particular dispatcher: Flexible load balancing with Akka in Scala

Global configuration¶

You can make the Actor mailbox bounded by a capacity in two ways. Either you define it in the configuration file under ‘default-dispatcher’. This will set it globally.

actor {
  default-dispatcher {
    mailbox-capacity = -1            # If negative (or zero) then an unbounded mailbox is used (default)
                                     # If positive then a bounded mailbox is used and the capacity is set to the number specified
  }
}

Per-instance based configuration¶

You can also do it on a specific dispatcher instance.

For the ‘ExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher’ and the ‘ExecutorBasedWorkStealingDispatcher’ you can do it through their constructor

class MyActor extends UntypedActor {
  public MyActor() {
    int capacity = 100;
    Duration pushTimeout = new FiniteDuration(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
    MailboxType mailboxCapacity = new BoundedMailbox(false, capacity, pushTimeout);
    MessageDispatcher dispatcher =
        Dispatchers.newExecutorBasedEventDrivenDispatcher(name, throughput, mailboxCapacity).build();
    getContext().setDispatcher(dispatcher);
  }
   ...
}

For the ‘ThreadBasedDispatcher’, it is non-shareable between actors, and associates a dedicated Thread with the actor. Making it bounded (by specifying a capacity) is optional, but if you do, you need to provide a pushTimeout (default is 10 seconds). When trying to send a message to the Actor it will throw a MessageQueueAppendFailedException(“BlockingMessageTransferQueue transfer timed out”) if the message cannot be added to the mailbox within the time specified by the pushTimeout.

class MyActor extends UntypedActor {
  public MyActor() {
    int mailboxCapacity = 100;
    Duration pushTimeout = new FiniteDuration(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
    getContext().setDispatcher(Dispatchers.newThreadBasedDispatcher(getContext(), mailboxCapacity, pushTimeout));
  }
   ...
}